At first, it was kind of "cute" (for lack of better term) to go to certain websites and news stories to see what kinds of comments would be attached at the bottom. It almost became a game for some, as they tried to come up with more insane and belligerent comments than the next guy. It was like watching a head-on crash in slow-motion. But eventually, the line between ridiculous and unacceptable was crossed. Over and over again.
This has led us to the current situation, where media outlets are re-evaluating how they handle online comments. Some, like the CBC, have announced that you'll have to sign in and no longer be anonymous. Others, like the Toronto Star, shut them down altogether. By no means is this a new phenomenon, as Popular Science did it back in 2013.
The reasoning behind the move is really a no-brainer at the end of the day: it takes up a lot of time and resources to make sure each and every comment is worthy of being on a website. Rightly or wrongly, each comment made is, in part, a reflection on a media outlet. A hateful or threatening comment which is kept on a website for an extended period of time will expose an outlet as either being accepting of that behaviour or being lazy for deleting it in the first place. And as resources continue to be shifted around or chopped down, the priority can't be on babysitting the select few who want to take their liberties on a website.
Don't get me wrong. I'm all for you having the ability to voice your opinion on a story. The trouble is very few are actually interested in doing that. They're more interested in attacking others. They're not interested in moving the discussion forward or having a healthy dialogue on the topic at hand. And this mindset has an adverse reaction, as those who are actually interested in commenting on a story don't feel safe enough to post their own thoughts, for fear of being berated, belittled, or worse. This isn't an exaggeration. I see it on probably a weekly basis just going through the comments on the radio station's Facebook page (we don't allow comments on our website either). As I've written on that page, I'm not against debate and disagreement. What I am against is hate-filled commentary, profanity-laced tirades and threats.
What's even more disturbing about this trend is that those commenters are trying to hide behind the "freedom of speech" argument. My question to this is simple: when did freedom of speech get to trump basic human decency? You know the old saying: if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all. These are the same people who would never actually say these things face-to-face, but instead get to hide behind anonymous profiles to spew their garbage. I hate to break it to those people, but that's not exercising "freedom of speech." That's being a keyboard warrior, thinking you'll never face the ramifications for the things you say online. What the heck did these people do before the internet?
Don't let this debate get to be about "left vs. right" or any of that typical divisive stuff either. People of all shapes, sizes, colours and social statures are guilty of it. It's not the fault of "the media" or anyone else for the closing down of comment sections either. It was the actions of a faceless few, who seem to have this fascination with being mad at the world all the time. It must be tough living life like that.
Then again, life must be tough in mom and dad's basement.